Ricardo Mello vs Miguel Gallardo Valles, San Antonio 2002, Round of 16
Final score
Final
7-6(5) 7-5Venue and conditions
McFarlin Tennis CenterSan Antonio, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Mello
0Valles
1 meeting- San AntonioRound of 16 · 2002HardThis matchRicardo MelloSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Miguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 0Set 1: 65Set 2: 5
Form and path
Ricardo Mello3–3
Sao PauloClay
Sao Paulo CHHard
Rio De Janeiro CHClay
- LQuarterfinalGuido PellaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ricardo MelloSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WRound of 16Ricardo MelloSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Joao SouzaSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 64Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Ricardo MelloSets won: 2Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Fabiano De PaulaSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
Miguel Gallardo Valles4–2
TehuacánHard
- LQuarterfinalChristopher Diaz FigueroaSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Miguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 4
- WRound of 16Miguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ivar Jose Aramburu ContrerasSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Miguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Collin JohnsSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
- WQualifying R2Miguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Raul Isaias Rosas ZarurSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Rosarito BeachHard
- LFinalDaniel GarzaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Miguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- WSemifinalMiguel Gallardo VallesSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 62Set 3: 6Tigre HankSets won: 1Set 1: 64Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.