Marcelo Charpentier vs Jiri Vanek, Aschaffenburg 2002, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-4 7-6(7)Venue and conditions
TC Schonbusch AschaffenburgAschaffenburg, GER
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Charpentier
1Vanek
2 meetings- AschaffenburgQuarterfinal · 2002ClayThis matchMarcelo CharpentierSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jiri VanekSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 67
- BudaorsSemifinal · 2002ClayJiri VanekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marcelo CharpentierSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Form and path
Marcelo Charpentier5–1
Torre del GrecoClay
- WFinalMarcelo CharpentierSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Matteo MarraiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
- WSemifinalMarcelo CharpentierSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Matteo VolanteSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
- WQuarterfinalMarcelo CharpentierSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alessandro AccardoSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
- WRound of 16Marcelo CharpentierSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Luca RovettaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
- WRound of 32Marcelo CharpentierSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Ismar GorcicSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
ModenaClay
- LSemifinalThomas FabbianoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Marcelo CharpentierSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 2
Jiri Vanek1–5
MostClay
- LRound of 16Alexander BurySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jiri VanekSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Jiri VanekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Ricardo Urzua RiveraSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 64
Bratislava CHHard
Trnava CHClay
Szczecin CHClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.