Jeff Salzenstein vs Scott Draper, Binghamton Challenger 2002, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard

Final

Jeff Salzenstein

LostRank #1364

Draper won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Scott Draper

WinnerRank #1110

Venue

Recreation Park tennis courts, Binghamton

Binghamton, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

262 m

Low

Head to head

0Salzenstein

3Draper

3 meetings

Hard 0–2Grass 0–1

Binghamton ChallengerSemifinal · 2002HardThis match
Scott Draper
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Fresno ChallengerRound of 32 · 2002Hard
Scott Draper
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
NewportQualifying R3 · 10 Jul 2000Grass
Scott Draper
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3

Form and path

Jeff Salzenstein4–2

HoustonClay

LQualifying R1
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Tallahassee CHHard

Mexico City CHClay

WQualifying R1
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Garcia Villa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Scott Draper0–6

WimbledonGrass

LRound of 128
Nikolay Davydenko
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Scott Draper
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 4Set 3: 3

Queen's ClubGrass

LRound of 64
Victor Hanescu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Scott Draper
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 2

Roland GarrosClay

LRound of 128
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 3Set 4: 6Set 5: 6
Scott Draper
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Set 4: 0Set 5: 1

Prague CHClay

LRound of 32
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Scott Draper
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Australian OpenHard

LRound of 128
Tommy Robredo
Sets won: 3Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Set 4: 6
Scott Draper
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 4Set 4: 2

Tiburon CHHard

LQuarterfinal
Alex Bogomolov Jr
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6
Scott Draper
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2
Scott Draper · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jeff Salzenstein vs Scott Draper, Binghamton Challenger 2002, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research