Justin Gimelstob vs Jonathan Erlich, Newport 2002, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 6-0Venue and conditions
International Tennis Hall of FameNewport, USA
GrassCourt speed0.4 vs last year102.3Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Match stats
57m3Aces0
3Double faults4
29Service points won22
8Service games played8
7Service games won3
8Return games played8
1/250%Break points saved38%3/8
5/863%Break points converted50%1/2
Head to head
1Gimelstob
0Erlich
1 meeting- NewportRound of 16 · 2002GrassThis matchJustin GimelstobSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jonathan ErlichSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
Form and path
Justin Gimelstob1–5
St. PetersburgCarpet
TokyoHard
Jonathan Erlich2–4
Los AngelesHard
MilanCarpet
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.