Jens Knippschild vs Martin Verkerk, Ulm Challenger 2002, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Jens Knippschild

LostRank #1302

Verkerk won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 25–7

Martin Verkerk

WinnerRank #984

Venue

SSV Ulm 1846, Ulm

Ulm, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

469 m

Moderate

Head to head

0Knippschild

1Verkerk

1 meeting

Ulm ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2002ClayThis match
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Jens Knippschild
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5

Form and path

Jens Knippschild3–3

Wolfsburg CHCarpet

LQualifying R1
Jakub Herm Zahlava
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jens Knippschild
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

StuttgartHard

LQuarterfinal
Jerome Haehnel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jens Knippschild
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
WRound of 16
Jens Knippschild
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Michael Lammer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
WRound of 32
Jens Knippschild
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Robert Lindstedt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Eckental CHCarpet

Martin Verkerk2–4

Tarragona CHClay

LRound of 32
Marc Fornell Mestres
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Bucharest CHClay

AmersfoortClay

LRound of 32
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7¹¹Set 3: 4
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁹Set 3: 3
Martin Verkerk · Retired

Scheveningen CHClay

LRound of 32
Christophe Rochus
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 5

KasselClay

WFinal
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹³
Felipe Parada
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6¹¹

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jens Knippschild vs Martin Verkerk, Ulm Challenger 2002, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research