Todd Larkham vs Eyal Erlich, Wimbledon 2002, Qualifying R1

Grand Slam · Qualifying R1 · Grass · Wed 19 Jun

Final

Todd Larkham

WinnerRank #1466

Larkham won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 23–6

Set 36–3

Eyal Erlich

LostRank #1345

Venue

All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club

London, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

2.7vs last year

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

37 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Larkham

0Erlich

1 meeting

WimbledonQualifying R1 · 19 Jun 2002GrassThis match
Todd Larkham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Eyal Erlich
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Form and path

Todd Larkham

No recent matches recorded.

Eyal Erlich4–2

Queen's ClubGrass

LQualifying R1
Rik De Voest
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Eyal Erlich
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Osaka CHHard

Kyoto CHCarpet

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Todd Larkham vs Eyal Erlich, Wimbledon 2002, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research