Ivan Vajda vs Tim Koniarski, Furth Challenger 2002, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 1 Jun

Final

Ivan Vajda

WinnerRank #955

Vajda won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Tim Koniarski

LostUnranked

Venue

TV 1860 Furth (Franken Challenge / Schickedanz Open)

Furth, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

64%

Moderate

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

301 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Vajda

0Koniarski

1 meeting

Furth ChallengerQualifying R1 · 1 Jun 2002ClayThis match
Ivan Vajda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tim Koniarski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Form and path

Ivan Vajda2–0

Sanremo CHClay

Tim Koniarski

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivan Vajda vs Tim Koniarski, Furth Challenger 2002, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research