Jeff Salzenstein vs Ivan Miranda, Roland Garros 2002, Qualifying R3
Final score
Final
3-6 6-3 6-4Venue and conditions
Stade Roland-GarrosParis, FRA
ClayCourt speed1.5 vs last year94.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Head to head
2Salzenstein
3Miranda
5 meetingsClay 0–2Hard 2–1
- Roland GarrosQualifying R3 · 24 May 2002ClayThis matchIvan MirandaSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
- LeonRound of 16 · 15 Apr 2004HardJeff SalzensteinSets won: 2Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Ivan MirandaSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- CalabasasRound of 16 · 2003HardJeff SalzensteinSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 64Set 3: 6Ivan MirandaSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
- BirminghamRound of 16 · 2002ClayIvan MirandaSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
- SalinasRound of 16 · 2002HardIvan MirandaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 6Jeff SalzensteinSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.