Cecil Mamiit vs Jeff Morrison, Birmingham Challenger 2002, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Cecil Mamiit

WinnerRank #1573

Mamiit won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Jeff Morrison

LostRank #1456

Venue

Brook Highland Racquet Club

Birmingham, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

183 m

Low

Head to head

4Mamiit

2Morrison

6 meetings

Clay 2–0Hard 2–2

Birmingham ChallengerSemifinal · 2002ClayThis match
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Tunica Resorts ChallengerRound of 32 · 9 May 2006Clay
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Waikoloa ChallengerRound of 16 · 29 Jan 2004Hard
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6⁴
Waco ChallengerRound of 16 · 2003Hard
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 4
San JoseQualifying R3 · 25 Feb 2002Hard
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6³
Champaign ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2002Hard
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6³Set 2: 7Set 3: 3

Form and path

Cecil Mamiit2–4

CalabasasHard

LRound of 16
Pedro Zerbini
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3
WRound of 32
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Bassam Beidas
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5

Los AngelesHard

LQualifying R1
Tim Smyczek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Calabasas CHHard

LRound of 32
Gary Sacks
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Tiburon CHHard

Jeff Morrison1–5

Nashville CHHard

LRound of 32
Frank Dancevic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3

Louisville CHHard

LRound of 32
Jesse Witten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁵

Calabasas CHHard

LRound of 32
Robert Kendrick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Sacramento CHHard

Tulsa CHHard

LQuarterfinal
Bobby Reynolds
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Cecil Mamiit vs Jeff Morrison, Birmingham Challenger 2002, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research