Oliver Gross def. Gabriel Trifu 6-4 6-1

Back

Sanremo Challenger

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Oliver Gross

WinnerGER · Rank #1535

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–1

Gabriel Trifu

LostROU · Rank #1220

Gross won in 2 sets

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Tennis Sanremo

Sanremo, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

19 m

Sea level

Head to head

2Gross

0Trifu

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Sanremo ChallengerSemifinal · 2002ClayThis match
Oliver Gross
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
US OpenQualifying R1 · 21 Aug 2002Hard
Oliver Gross
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 2

Form and path

Oliver Gross3–3

KitzbuhelClay

StuttgartClay

Oberstaufen CHClay

LRound of 32
Andres Dellatorre
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Oliver Gross
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Gabriel Trifu2–4

Freudenstadt CHClay

Milan CHCarpet

LRound of 32
Ivo Heuberger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

SopotClay

Hilversum CHClay

LQualifying R2
Marcin Matkowski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 7Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Back

Sanremo Challenger

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Oliver Gross

WinnerGER · Rank #1535

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–1

Gabriel Trifu

LostROU · Rank #1220

Gross won in 2 sets

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Tennis Sanremo

Sanremo, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

19 m

Sea level

Head to head

2Gross

0Trifu

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Sanremo ChallengerSemifinal · 2002ClayThis match
Oliver Gross
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
US OpenQualifying R1 · 21 Aug 2002Hard
Oliver Gross
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 2

Form and path

Oliver Gross3–3

KitzbuhelClay

StuttgartClay

Oberstaufen CHClay

LRound of 32
Andres Dellatorre
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Oliver Gross
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Gabriel Trifu2–4

Freudenstadt CHClay

Milan CHCarpet

LRound of 32
Ivo Heuberger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

SopotClay

Hilversum CHClay

LQualifying R2
Marcin Matkowski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Gabriel Trifu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 7Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research