Edwin Kempes vs Jurgen Melzer, Sanremo 2002, Round of 16
Final score
Final
7-5 6-2
Venue and conditions
Tennis SanremoSanremo, ITA
ClayCourt speed91.1Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Kempes
0Melzer
1 meeting- SanremoRound of 16 · 2002ClayThis matchEdwin KempesSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jurgen MelzerSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
Form and path
Edwin Kempes2–4
Scheveningen CHClay
MettmannCarpet
- LRound of 32Sebastian RieschickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Edwin KempesSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
DohaHard
- LRound of 16Vasilis MazarakisSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Edwin KempesSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Edwin KempesSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Dawid OlejniczakSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Dawid Olejniczak · Retired
Jurgen Melzer2–4
Winston-SalemHard
Aix En Provence CHClay
Marbella CHClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.