Fabrice Santoro vs James Blake, Miami Masters 2002, Round of 64

Masters 1000 · Round of 64 · Hard

Final

Fabrice Santoro

LostRank #1421.7055%

Blake won in 3 sets · 2h 6m

1–2

Set 16–2

Set 25–7

Set 33–6

James Blake

WinnerRank #10202.0545%Upset

Venue

Tennis Center at Crandon Park

Key Biscayne, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

2.5vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Match stats

2h 6m

1Aces4

4Double faults2

59Service points won61

14Service games played15

10Service games won11

15Return games played14

9/1369%Break points saved60%6/10

4/1040%Break points converted31%4/13

Head to head

1Santoro

5Blake

6 meetings

Miami MastersRound of 64 · 2002HardThis match
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 3
Paris MastersRound of 64 · 8 Nov 2009Hard
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Miami MastersRound of 32 · 30 Mar 2008Hard
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 4
SydneyRound of 32 · 7 Jan 2008Hard
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
James Blake
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 2
US OpenRound of 64 · 30 Aug 2007Hard
James Blake
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Set 4: 4Set 5: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2Set 4: 6Set 5: 4
Cincinnati MastersRound of 64 · 14 Aug 2006Hard
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Form and path

Fabrice Santoro1–5

Australian OpenHard

LRound of 128
Marin Cilic
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Paris MastersHard

LRound of 64
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

LyonHard

LRound of 32
Albert Montanes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

MoscowHard

TokyoHard

LRound of 16
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1

James Blake2–4

US OpenHard

LRound of 128
Ivo Karlovic
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6²Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Set 4: 7⁷Set 5: 7⁷
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6Set 3: 4Set 4: 6²Set 5: 6²

Winston-SalemHard

Cincinnati MastersHard

WashingtonHard

LRound of 64
Marinko Matosevic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁸
James Blake
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6⁶

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Fabrice Santoro vs James Blake, Miami Masters 2002, Round of 64

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research