Jeff Greenwald vs Jeff Morrison, San Jose 2002, Qualifying R1

ATP Intl Series · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 23 Feb

Final

Jeff Greenwald

LostRank #1345

Morrison won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–2

Set 25–7

Set 33–6

Jeff Morrison

WinnerRank #1456

Venue

SAP Center at San Jose (San Jose Arena / HP Pavilion at San Jose)

San Jose, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

0.1vs last year

Altitude

37 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Greenwald

1Morrison

1 meeting

San JoseQualifying R1 · 23 Feb 2002HardThis match
Jeff Morrison
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Jeff Greenwald
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Form and path

Jeff Greenwald0–1

Aptos CHHard

LQualifying R2
Doug Bohaboy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Greenwald
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

Jeff Morrison

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jeff Greenwald vs Jeff Morrison, San Jose 2002, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research