Andrew Painter vs Louis Vosloo, Hull Challenger 2002, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Carpet · Sat 16 Feb

Final

Andrew Painter

WinnerRank #1132

Painter won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 26–7¹⁰

Set 36–2

Louis Vosloo

LostRank #1345

Venue

Hull Sports Centre

Hull, GBR· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

91%

Very humid

Temperature

8°C

Cool

Altitude

5 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Painter

0Vosloo

1 meeting

Hull ChallengerQualifying R1 · 16 Feb 2002CarpetThis match
Andrew Painter
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6¹⁰Set 3: 6
Louis Vosloo
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7¹²Set 3: 2

Form and path

Andrew Painter3–1

Dallas CHHard

Champaign CHHard

Louis Vosloo

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andrew Painter vs Louis Vosloo, Hull Challenger 2002, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research