Jan Vacek vs Edwin Kempes, Heilbronn Challenger 2002, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Carpet

Final

Jan Vacek

WinnerRank #1155

Vacek won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–2

Set 24–6

Set 36–2

Edwin Kempes

LostRank #1495

Venue

Tennis-Center Talheim

Talheim, GER· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

205 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

1Vacek

0Kempes

1 meeting

Heilbronn ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2002CarpetThis match
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

Form and path

Jan Vacek3–3

Manchester CHGrass

LRound of 32
Sam Groth
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 7⁷
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6⁵

WimbledonGrass

HalleGrass

Edwin Kempes2–4

CeutaHard

W
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Carlos Diaz Ruiz
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Scheveningen CHClay

LQualifying R1
Niels van Hal
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2
Edwin Kempes · Retired

MettmannCarpet

LRound of 32
Sebastian Rieschick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

DohaHard

LRound of 16
Vasilis Mazarakis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
WRound of 32
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Dawid Olejniczak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Dawid Olejniczak · Retired

AmersfoortClay

LQualifying R2
Santiago Ventura
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Vacek vs Edwin Kempes, Heilbronn Challenger 2002, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research