Cecil Mamiit vs Martin Verkerk, Houston Challenger 2001, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Cecil Mamiit

LostRank #1573

Verkerk won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Martin Verkerk

WinnerRank #984

Venue

Raveneaux Country Club

Spring, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

36 m

Sea level

Head to head

0Mamiit

4Verkerk

4 meetings

Hard 0–3Clay 0–1

Houston ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2001HardThis match
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
ScottsdaleRound of 16 · 5 Mar 2004Hard
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Prostejov ChallengerRound of 32 · 2002Clay
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
Cecil Mamiit · Retired
Dallas ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2002Hard
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁵

Form and path

Cecil Mamiit2–4

CalabasasHard

LRound of 16
Pedro Zerbini
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3
WRound of 32
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Bassam Beidas
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5

Los AngelesHard

LQualifying R1
Tim Smyczek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Calabasas CHHard

LRound of 32
Gary Sacks
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Tiburon CHHard

Martin Verkerk2–4

Tarragona CHClay

LRound of 32
Marc Fornell Mestres
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Bucharest CHClay

AmersfoortClay

LRound of 32
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7¹¹Set 3: 4
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁹Set 3: 3
Martin Verkerk · Retired

Scheveningen CHClay

LRound of 32
Christophe Rochus
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 5

KasselClay

WFinal
Martin Verkerk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹³
Felipe Parada
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6¹¹

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Cecil Mamiit vs Martin Verkerk, Houston Challenger 2001, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research