Jim Thomas vs Matthieu Amgwerd, Tokyo 2001, Qualifying R2

ATP Intl Gold · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 30 Sept

Final

Jim Thomas

WinnerRank #1284

Thomas won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–4

Matthieu Amgwerd

LostUnranked

Venue

Ariake Coliseum

Koto City, JPN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

3.2vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Thomas

0Amgwerd

1 meeting

TokyoQualifying R2 · 30 Sept 2001HardThis match
Jim Thomas
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Matthieu Amgwerd
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Form and path

Jim Thomas

No recent matches recorded.

Matthieu Amgwerd

TokyoThis week

WQualifying R1
Matthieu Amgwerd
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Yasuo Miyazaki
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jim Thomas vs Matthieu Amgwerd, Tokyo 2001, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research