Artem Derepasko vs Aisam Ul Haq Qureshi, Samarkand 2001, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
1-6 6-3 6-4Venue and conditions
Tennis Club Dinamo, SamarkandSamarkand, UZB
ClayCourt speed99.5Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Derepasko
0Qureshi
1 meeting- SamarkandQuarterfinal · 2001ClayThis matchArtem DerepaskoSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Aisam Ul Haq QureshiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
Form and path
Artem Derepasko2–4
Bukhara CHHard
- LRound of 16Daniel AnderssonSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Artem DerepaskoSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 2
- WRound of 32Artem DerepaskoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Mikhail ElginSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Samarkand CHClay
- LRound of 32Orest TereshchukSets won: 0Set 1: 4Artem DerepaskoSets won: 0Set 1: 2
Artem Derepasko · Retired
Donetsk CHClay
- LRound of 16Leonardo AzzaroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Artem DerepaskoSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
- WRound of 32Artem DerepaskoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pavel LobanovSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
Kiev CHClay
- LRound of 32Orest TereshchukSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Artem DerepaskoSets won: 1Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Aisam Ul Haq Qureshi2–4
ChengduHard
s HertogenboschGrass
- LQualifying R3Illya MarchenkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 66Set 3: 7Aisam Ul Haq QureshiSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 5
- WQualifying R2Aisam Ul Haq QureshiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Nicholas MonroeSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 1
- WQualifying R1Aisam Ul Haq QureshiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Max De VroomeSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.