Goran Ivanisevic vs Gustavo Kuerten, Indianapolis 2001, Semifinal

ATP Intl Gold · Semifinal · Hard

Final

Goran Ivanisevic

LostRank #3953.0031%

Kuerten won in 3 sets · 1h 8m

1–2

Set 16–1

Set 23–6

Set 32–6

Gustavo Kuerten

WinnerRank #11321.3369%

Venue

Indianapolis Tennis Center (IUPUI)

Indianapolis, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

2.6vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

217 m

Low

Match stats

1h 8m

14Aces11

1Double faults2

41Service points won45

12Service games played12

9Service games won10

12Return games played12

3/650%Break points saved50%2/4

2/450%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Ivanisevic

4Kuerten

5 meetings

IndianapolisSemifinal · 2001HardThis match
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
Indian Wells MastersRound of 64 · 11 Mar 2003Hard
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
ATP FinalsRound robin · 2001Hard
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6²Set 3: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 4
Cincinnati MastersRound of 16 · 2001Hard
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Miami MastersRound of 32 · 2000Hard
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3

Form and path

Goran Ivanisevic2–4

WimbledonGrass

Queen's ClubGrass

LRound of 64
Victor Hanescu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Rome MastersClay

LRound of 64
Radek Stepanek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

MunichClay

LRound of 32
Alexander Waske
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Goran Ivanisevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁰

Gustavo Kuerten1–5

Roland GarrosClay

LRound of 128
Paul Henri Mathieu
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

Monte Carlo MastersClay

LRound of 64
Ivan Ljubicic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Florianopolis CHClay

Miami MastersHard

LRound of 128
Sebastien Grosjean
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5

Costa Do SauipeClay

LRound of 32
Carlos Berlocq
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Goran Ivanisevic vs Gustavo Kuerten, Indianapolis 2001, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research