Phil Stolt vs Kyle Porter, Bronx Challenger 2001, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 11 Aug

Final

Phil Stolt

LostRank #1446

Porter won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 27–6⁷

Set 33–6

Kyle Porter

WinnerUnranked

Venue

Crotona Park (tennis courts)

Bronx, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

75%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

35 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Stolt

1Porter

1 meeting

Bronx ChallengerQualifying R1 · 11 Aug 2001HardThis match
Kyle Porter
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁷Set 3: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁹Set 3: 3

Form and path

Phil Stolt

No recent matches recorded.

Kyle Porter2–2

NewportGrass

Tallahassee CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Phil Stolt vs Kyle Porter, Bronx Challenger 2001, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research