Tim Henman vs Jan Michael Gambill, Cincinnati Masters 2001, Quarterfinal

Masters 1000 · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Tim Henman

WinnerRank #6151.7553%

Henman won in 3 sets · 2h 23m

2–1

Set 14–6

Set 26–2

Set 36–2

Jan Michael Gambill

LostRank #13521.9547%

Venue

Lindner Family Tennis Center

Mason, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

0.7vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

237 m

Low

Match stats

2h 23m

2Aces10

3Double faults12

56Service points won56

13Service games played13

10Service games won7

13Return games played13

10/1377%Break points saved70%14/20

6/2030%Break points converted23%3/13

Head to head

4Henman

0Gambill

4 meetings

Hard 3–0Clay 1–0

Cincinnati MastersQuarterfinal · 2001HardThis match
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
WashingtonRound of 16 · 3 Aug 2006Hard
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
Hamburg MastersRound of 64 · 12 May 2003Clay
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
Indian Wells MastersRound of 64 · 11 Mar 2003Hard
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Form and path

Tim Henman2–4

US OpenHard

Cincinnati MastersHard

LRound of 64
Juan Ignacio Chela
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

WashingtonHard

LRound of 64
John Isner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

WimbledonGrass

Jan Michael Gambill2–4

IrvineHard

LQuarterfinal
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3
Jan Michael Gambill · Retired
WRound of 16
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Marcos Giron
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
WRound of 32
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
Jordan Cox · Retired

ClaremontHard

LRound of 32
James Duckworth
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁸
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6⁶

Savannah CHClay

LRound of 32
Alex Kuznetsov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

San JoseHard

LQualifying R2
Giovanni Lapentti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Henman vs Jan Michael Gambill, Cincinnati Masters 2001, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research