Janne Ojala vs Jarkko Nieminen, Tampere Challenger 2001, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Janne Ojala

LostRank #1118

Nieminen won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Jarkko Nieminen

WinnerRank #1029

Venue

Pyynikin tenniskentät

Tampere, FIN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

102 m

Low

Head to head

0Ojala

2Nieminen

2 meetings

Tampere ChallengerSemifinal · 2001ClayThis match
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Janne Ojala
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Tampere ChallengerRound of 16 · 2002Clay
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Janne Ojala
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

Form and path

Janne Ojala3–3

Tampere CHClay

VierumäkiClay

LRound of 16
Martin Rammal
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Janne Ojala
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
WRound of 32
Janne Ojala
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tuomo Ojala
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

SavitaipaleClay

LSemifinal
Dominik Meffert
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Janne Ojala
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Jarkko Nieminen1–5

StockholmHard

LRound of 32
Nicolas Almagro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 4

TokyoHard

LQualifying R1
Mikhail Youzhny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 3

Kuala LumpurHard

LRound of 32
Tatsuma Ito
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6³

US OpenHard

LRound of 128
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1Set 3: 1

Tampere CHClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Janne Ojala vs Jarkko Nieminen, Tampere Challenger 2001, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research