Tuomas Ketola vs Vadim Kutsenko, Montauban Challenger 2001, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay

Final

Tuomas Ketola

LostRank #1512

Kutsenko won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 17–6²

Set 24–6

Set 31–6

Vadim Kutsenko

WinnerRank #1557

Venue

Association Tennis de Montauban — former Aussonne grounds

Montauban, FRA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

99 m

Low

Head to head

1Ketola

1Kutsenko

2 meetings

Clay 0–1Carpet 1–0

Montauban ChallengerRound of 16 · 2001ClayThis match
Vadim Kutsenko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6²Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Tuomas Ketola
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 1
MoscowQualifying R1 · 21 Oct 2000Carpet
Tuomas Ketola
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Vadim Kutsenko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1

Form and path

Tuomas Ketola2–4

Tampere CHClay

LRound of 32
Ernests Gulbis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tuomas Ketola
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Helsinki CHHard

LRound of 32
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Tuomas Ketola
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Tampere CHClay

LRound of 32
Simone Bolelli
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3
Tuomas Ketola
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 6²Set 3: 0
Tuomas Ketola · Retired

WimbledonGrass

Vadim Kutsenko3–3

TelaviClay

LQualifying R1
Stepan Beresnev
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Vadim Kutsenko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

ShymkentHard

ShymkentClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tuomas Ketola vs Vadim Kutsenko, Montauban Challenger 2001, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research