David Ferrer vs Jakub Cech, Prague Challenger 2001, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Clay · Sun 13 May

Final

David Ferrer

WinnerRank #224

Ferrer won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Jakub Cech

LostUnranked

Venue

I. ČLTK Praha

Prague, CZE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

187 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Ferrer

0Cech

1 meeting

Prague ChallengerQualifying R2 · 13 May 2001ClayThis match
David Ferrer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jakub Cech
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Form and path

David Ferrer

No recent matches recorded.

Jakub Cech

Prague CHThis week

WQualifying R1
Jakub Cech
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Petr Vanicek (1971)
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

David Ferrer vs Jakub Cech, Prague Challenger 2001, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research