Ronald Agenor vs Michael Russell, Birmingham 2001, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-2 6-3Venue and conditions
Brook Highland Racquet ClubBirmingham, USA
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Agenor
2Russell
2 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 0–1
- BirminghamQuarterfinal · 2001ClayThis matchMichael RussellSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ronald AgenorSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- ChampaignRound of 16 · 2000HardMichael RussellSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ronald AgenorSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Form and path
Ronald Agenor2–4
Genoa CHClay
Aptos CHHard
Calabasas CHHard
- LQualifying R3Thomas DupreSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1Ronald AgenorSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Ronald Agenor · Retired
- WQualifying R2Ronald AgenorSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Paul LogtensSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
- WQualifying R1Ronald AgenorSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Laurence TielemanSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
San Luis Potosi CHClay
- LRound of 32Edgardo MassaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ronald AgenorSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Michael Russell2–4
Sarasota CHClay
- LRound of 32Renzo OlivoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael RussellSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- LQualifying R3Rogerio Dutra SilvaSets won: 2Set 1: 65Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Michael RussellSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R2Michael RussellSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Facundo MenaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R1Michael RussellSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Fernando RomboliSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 65
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.