Greg Rusedski vs Julien Boutter, Milan 2001, Semifinal
Final score
Final
7-6(5) 7-6(3)
Venue and conditions
PalaLidoMilan, ITA
CarpetCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Match stats
1h 34m15Aces15
4Double faults9
56Service points won61
12Service games played12
12Service games won12
12Return games played12
1/1100%Break points saved100%3/3
0/30%Break points converted0%0/1
Head to head
1Rusedski
3Boutter
4 meetingsCarpet 0–1Hard 1–2
- MilanSemifinal · 2001CarpetThis matchJulien BoutterSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Greg RusedskiSets won: 0Set 1: 65Set 2: 63
- Indian Wells MastersRound of 32 · 2002HardJulien BoutterSets won: 2Set 1: 64Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Greg RusedskiSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
- Stuttgart MastersRound of 64 · 2001HardJulien BoutterSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Greg RusedskiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- WashingtonRound of 32 · 2001HardGreg RusedskiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Julien BoutterSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 62
Form and path
Greg Rusedski2–4
Sarajevo CHHard
Dnepropetrovsk CHHard
Julien Boutter1–5
WimbledonGrass
Roland GarrosClay
CasablancaClay
Monte Carlo MastersClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.