Tim Henman vs Thomas Johansson, Adelaide 2001, Quarterfinal

ATP Intl Series · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Tim Henman

WinnerRank #6151.4066%

Henman won in 3 sets · 2h 35m

2–1

Set 17–6²

Set 26–7⁴

Set 36–3

Thomas Johansson

LostRank #5862.7534%

Venue

Memorial Drive (The Drive)

Adelaide, AUS· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

0.3vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

25 m

Sea level

Match stats

2h 35m

8Aces2

3Double faults1

69Service points won67

17Service games played16

14Service games won12

16Return games played17

1/425%Break points saved64%7/11

4/1136%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

4Henman

2Johansson

6 meetings

Hard 2–1Clay 2–0Grass 0–1

AdelaideQuarterfinal · 2001HardThis match
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6²Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3
Rome MastersRound of 32 · 10 May 2006Clay
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 1
RotterdamRound of 32 · 22 Feb 2006Hard
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Queen's ClubQuarterfinal · 10 Jun 2005Grass
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Monte Carlo MastersQuarterfinal · 2002Clay
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴
DubaiQuarterfinal · 2002Hard
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Form and path

Tim Henman2–4

US OpenHard

Cincinnati MastersHard

LRound of 64
Juan Ignacio Chela
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

WashingtonHard

LRound of 64
John Isner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

WimbledonGrass

Thomas Johansson1–5

Miami MastersHard

LQualifying R1
Flavio Cipolla
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Sunrise CHHard

LRound of 32
Denis Gremelmayr
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

StockholmHard

LRound of 32
Albert Montanes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

US OpenHard

LRound of 128
Ernests Gulbis
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1Set 3: 6³

Olympic GamesHard

LRound of 32
Mikhail Youzhny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
WRound of 64
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Henman vs Thomas Johansson, Adelaide 2001, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research