Daniele Musa vs Mose Navarra, Milan Challenger 2000, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Carpet

Final

Daniele Musa

LostRank #1168

Navarra won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–7⁵

Mose Navarra

WinnerRank #1351

Venue

Sporting Milano 3

Basiglio, ITA· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

100 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

0Musa

1Navarra

1 meeting

Milan ChallengerSemifinal · 2000CarpetThis match
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁵

Form and path

Daniele Musa4–2

Bressanone CHClay

LRound of 32
Giorgio Galimberti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7⁷
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 6⁵
WQualifying R3
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Dusan Vemic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 3
WQualifying R2
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Pietro Ansaldo
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

San Benedetto Del Tronto CHClay

LRound of 32
Daniele Bracciali
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7⁷
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 6⁴
WQualifying R3
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Miguel Miranda
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
WQualifying R1
Daniele Musa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Riccardo Capannelli
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Mose Navarra2–4

ChennaiHard

Manchester CHGrass

LQualifying R1
Jonathan Erlich
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Bristol CHGrass

LRound of 32
Kirill Ivanov Smolensky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6⁴
LQualifying R3
David Mcnamara
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
WQualifying R2
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Neil Bamford
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniele Musa vs Mose Navarra, Milan Challenger 2000, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research