Michael Jessup vs Raemon Sluiter, Tulsa Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Michael Jessup

LostRank #979

Sluiter won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Raemon Sluiter

WinnerRank #1007

Venue

Philcrest Hills Tennis Club

Tulsa, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

188 m

Low

Head to head

0Jessup

1Sluiter

1 meeting

Tulsa ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2000HardThis match
Raemon Sluiter
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michael Jessup
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Form and path

Michael Jessup4–2

San JoseHard

Aptos CHHard

Raemon Sluiter3–3

Rhodes CHHard

Johannesburg CHHard

Sarajevo CHHard

LRound of 32
Ismar Gorcic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁸
Raemon Sluiter
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁶

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michael Jessup vs Raemon Sluiter, Tulsa Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research