John Van Lottum vs Juraj Hasko, Bukhara 2000, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 6-3Venue and conditions
Dilkusho Tennis ComplexBukhara, UZB
Outdoor hardCourt speed95.5Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Lottum
0Hasko
1 meeting- BukharaRound of 16 · 2000HardThis matchJohn Van LottumSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Juraj HaskoSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Form and path
John Van Lottum2–4
BastadClay
Roland GarrosClay
Juraj Hasko4–2
Budaors CHClay
Kosice 2 CHClay
- LRound of 32Federico BrowneSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Juraj HaskoSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R3Juraj HaskoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin StepanekSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Juraj HaskoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Igor ZelenaySets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R1Juraj HaskoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Sebo KissSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.