Jiri Vanek vs Adrian Garcia, Graz 2000, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-4 6-4Venue and conditions
Center West — former MediaMarkt rooftop tennis venueGraz, AUT
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
2Vanek
1Garcia
3 meetings- GrazQuarterfinal · 2000ClayThis matchAdrian GarciaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jiri VanekSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- PoznanRound of 32 · 3 Aug 2004ClayJiri VanekSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Adrian GarciaSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
- FurthQuarterfinal · 4 Jun 2004ClayJiri VanekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian GarciaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
Form and path
Jiri Vanek1–5
MostClay
- LRound of 16Alexander BurySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jiri VanekSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Jiri VanekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Ricardo Urzua RiveraSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 64
Bratislava CHHard
Trnava CHClay
Szczecin CHClay
Adrian Garcia1–5
KemptenClay
- LRound of 32George Von MassowSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Adrian GarciaSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 2
ÜberlingenClay
- LRound of 32Richard WaiteSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian GarciaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
KarlsruheClay
- LRound of 16Nils LangerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian GarciaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Adrian GarciaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Luca MargaroliSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
WetzlarClay
- LRound of 16Jakub LustykSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian GarciaSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.