Edwin Kempes vs Michal Tabara, Freudenstadt 2000, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-4 6-1Venue and conditions
TC SchierenbergFreudenstadt, GER
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Kempes
2Tabara
2 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 0–1
- FreudenstadtSemifinal · 2000ClayThis matchMichal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Edwin KempesSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
- ChennaiRound of 16 · 2001HardMichal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Edwin KempesSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
Form and path
Edwin Kempes2–4
Scheveningen CHClay
MettmannCarpet
- LRound of 32Sebastian RieschickSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Edwin KempesSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
DohaHard
- LRound of 16Vasilis MazarakisSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Edwin KempesSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Edwin KempesSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Dawid OlejniczakSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Dawid Olejniczak · Retired
Michal Tabara4–2
Jablonec nad NisouClay
- LQuarterfinalMartin KlizanSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michal TabaraSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
- WRound of 16Michal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tim Van TerheijdenSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WRound of 32Michal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Juho PaukkuSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
MostClay
- LFinalJerzy JanowiczSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 7Michal TabaraSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 63
- WQuarterfinalMichal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Andrey KuznetsovSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 61
- WRound of 16Michal TabaraSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin EmmrichSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.