Cristiano Caratti vs Jeff Salzenstein, Bronx Challenger 2000, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Cristiano Caratti

WinnerRank #836

Caratti won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 21–6

Set 37–6⁵

Jeff Salzenstein

LostRank #1364

Venue

Crotona Park (tennis courts)

Bronx, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

30 m

Sea level

Head to head

2Caratti

0Salzenstein

2 meetings

Hard 1–0Grass 1–0

Bronx ChallengerRound of 16 · 2000HardThis match
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 7⁷
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁵
WimbledonQualifying R1 · 21 Jun 2000Grass
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 1

Form and path

Cristiano Caratti1–5

Dallas CHHard

LQualifying R1
Daniel Lustig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Segovia CHHard

LQualifying R1
Jose Antonio Sanchez De Luna
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Valladolid CHHard

LQualifying R2
Tom Atkinson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁷Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁹Set 2: 3Set 3: 5
WQualifying R1
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Moises Parrilla-Ramos
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Manchester CHGrass

LQualifying R1
David Sherwood
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Nottingham CHGrass

LQualifying R1
Igor Zelenay
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Jeff Salzenstein4–2

HoustonClay

LQualifying R1
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Tallahassee CHHard

Mexico City CHClay

WQualifying R1
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Garcia Villa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Back

Cristiano Caratti vs Jeff Salzenstein, Bronx Challenger 2000, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Cristiano Caratti

WinnerRank #836

Caratti won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 21–6

Set 37–6⁵

Jeff Salzenstein

LostRank #1364

Venue

Crotona Park (tennis courts)

Bronx, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

30 m

Sea level

Head to head

2Caratti

0Salzenstein

2 meetings

Hard 1–0Grass 1–0

Bronx ChallengerRound of 16 · 2000HardThis match
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 7⁷
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁵
WimbledonQualifying R1 · 21 Jun 2000Grass
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 1

Form and path

Cristiano Caratti1–5

Dallas CHHard

LQualifying R1
Daniel Lustig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Segovia CHHard

LQualifying R1
Jose Antonio Sanchez De Luna
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Valladolid CHHard

LQualifying R2
Tom Atkinson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁷Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁹Set 2: 3Set 3: 5
WQualifying R1
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Moises Parrilla-Ramos
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Manchester CHGrass

LQualifying R1
David Sherwood
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Nottingham CHGrass

LQualifying R1
Igor Zelenay
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Jeff Salzenstein4–2

HoustonClay

LQualifying R1
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Tallahassee CHHard

Mexico City CHClay

WQualifying R1
Jeff Salzenstein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Garcia Villa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Cristiano Caratti vs Jeff Salzenstein, Bronx Challenger 2000, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research

Cristiano Caratti vs Jeff Salzenstein, Bronx Challenger 2000, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research