Tim Henman vs Gustavo Kuerten, Cincinnati Masters 2000, Semifinal

Masters 1000 · Semifinal · Hard

Final

Tim Henman

WinnerRank #615

Henman won in 3 sets · 2h 36m

2–1

Set 16–7¹¹

Set 26–3

Set 37–6⁰

Gustavo Kuerten

LostRank #1132

Venue

Lindner Family Tennis Center

Mason, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

237 m

Low

Match stats

2h 36m

16Aces13

6Double faults3

86Service points won81

17Service games played17

17Service games won16

17Return games played17

6/6100%Break points saved83%5/6

1/617%Break points converted0%0/6

Head to head

4Henman

3Kuerten

7 meetings

Hard 2–3Clay 1–0Carpet 1–0

Cincinnati MastersSemifinal · 2000HardThis match
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6¹¹Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7¹³Set 2: 3Set 3: 6⁰
Rome MastersRound of 64 · 2 May 2005Clay
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Canada MastersRound of 32 · 29 Jul 2004Hard
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
Paris MastersRound of 16 · 30 Oct 2003Carpet
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Cincinnati MastersRound of 64 · 2002Hard
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
IndianapolisQuarterfinal · 2001Hard
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 5

Form and path

Tim Henman2–4

US OpenHard

Cincinnati MastersHard

LRound of 64
Juan Ignacio Chela
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

WashingtonHard

LRound of 64
John Isner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

WimbledonGrass

Gustavo Kuerten1–5

Roland GarrosClay

LRound of 128
Paul Henri Mathieu
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

Monte Carlo MastersClay

LRound of 64
Ivan Ljubicic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Florianopolis CHClay

Miami MastersHard

LRound of 128
Sebastien Grosjean
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5

Costa Do SauipeClay

LRound of 32
Carlos Berlocq
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Gustavo Kuerten
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tim Henman vs Gustavo Kuerten, Cincinnati Masters 2000, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research