Fabrice Santoro vs Tim Henman, Cincinnati Masters 2000, Quarterfinal

Masters 1000 · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Fabrice Santoro

LostRank #142

Henman won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Tim Henman

WinnerRank #615

Venue

Lindner Family Tennis Center

Mason, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

237 m

Low

Match stats

1h 19m

0Aces5

1Double faults5

33Service points won40

8Service games played9

5Service games won9

9Return games played8

6/967%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted33%3/9

Head to head

2Santoro

5Henman

7 meetings

Hard 1–4Clay 1–1

Cincinnati MastersQuarterfinal · 2000HardThis match
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
RotterdamRound of 16 · 2002Hard
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Monte Carlo MastersRound of 64 · 2001Clay
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
Miami MastersRound of 64 · 2001Hard
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 3
ViennaRound of 16 · 2000Hard
Tim Henman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Rome MastersRound of 32 · 2000Clay
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Form and path

Fabrice Santoro1–5

Australian OpenHard

LRound of 128
Marin Cilic
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Paris MastersHard

LRound of 64
James Blake
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

LyonHard

LRound of 32
Albert Montanes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

MoscowHard

TokyoHard

LRound of 16
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Fabrice Santoro
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1

Tim Henman2–4

US OpenHard

Cincinnati MastersHard

LRound of 64
Juan Ignacio Chela
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

WashingtonHard

LRound of 64
John Isner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Tim Henman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

WimbledonGrass

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Fabrice Santoro vs Tim Henman, Cincinnati Masters 2000, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research