Jiri Vanek vs Marcus Sarstrand, Poznan Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Jiri Vanek

WinnerRank #1543

Vanek won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 14–6

Set 27–5

Set 37–6⁵

Marcus Sarstrand

LostRank #1377

Venue

Park Tenisowy Olimpia

Poznań, POL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

82 m

Low

Head to head

2Vanek

0Sarstrand

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Poznan ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2000ClayThis match
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 7⁷
Marcus Sarstrand
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6⁵
Wroclaw ChallengerRound of 32 · 2001Hard
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Marcus Sarstrand
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Form and path

Jiri Vanek1–5

MostClay

LRound of 16
Alexander Bury
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
WRound of 32
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Ricardo Urzua Rivera
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 6⁴

Bratislava CHHard

LRound of 32
Dominik Hrbaty
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Trnava CHClay

LRound of 32
Lukas Rosol
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
Jiri Vanek · Retired

Szczecin CHClay

LRound of 32
Tobias Kamke
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Manerbio CHClay

LRound of 16
Filippo Volandri
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jiri Vanek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Marcus Sarstrand3–3

Knoxville CHHard

Savannah CHClay

Tallahassee CHHard

LQualifying R3
Nicolas Todero
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Marcus Sarstrand
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jiri Vanek vs Marcus Sarstrand, Poznan Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research