Mose Navarra vs Arvind Parmar, Manchester Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Grass

Walkover

Mose Navarra

WinnerRank #1351

Navarra advanced · Walkover

Arvind Parmar

LostRank #1507

Venue

Northern Lawn Tennis Club

Manchester, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

37 m

Sea level

Head to head

0Navarra

0Parmar

0 meetings

Manchester ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2000GrassThis match
Mose Navarra
Arvind Parmar
Arvind Parmar · Walkover

Form and path

Mose Navarra2–4

ChennaiHard

Manchester CHGrass

LQualifying R1
Jonathan Erlich
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Bristol CHGrass

LRound of 32
Kirill Ivanov Smolensky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6⁴
LQualifying R3
David Mcnamara
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
WQualifying R2
Mose Navarra
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Neil Bamford
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Arvind Parmar2–4

Orleans CHHard

LQualifying R2
Jean-Kome Loglo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Robert Kendrick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Bronx CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mose Navarra vs Arvind Parmar, Manchester Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research