Magnus Gustafsson vs Edwin Kempes, Amsterdam 2000, Semifinal

ATP Intl Series · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Magnus Gustafsson

WinnerRank #681

Gustafsson won in 2 sets · 1h 12m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–4

Edwin Kempes

LostRank #1495

Venue

Amstelpark

Amsterdam, NED· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 12m

5Aces3

1Double faults0

36Service points won38

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

0/10%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted100%1/1

Head to head

1Gustafsson

0Kempes

1 meeting

AmsterdamSemifinal · 2000ClayThis match
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Form and path

Magnus Gustafsson4–2

StockholmHard

LRound of 16
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
WRound of 32
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Francisco Clavet
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

MoscowCarpet

LQuarterfinal
Tommy Haas
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
WRound of 16
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Wayne Ferreira
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 1
WRound of 32
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Nicolas Escude
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
WQualifying R3
Magnus Gustafsson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Wayne Black
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

Edwin Kempes2–4

CeutaHard

W
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Carlos Diaz Ruiz
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Scheveningen CHClay

LQualifying R1
Niels van Hal
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2
Edwin Kempes · Retired

MettmannCarpet

LRound of 32
Sebastian Rieschick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

DohaHard

LRound of 16
Vasilis Mazarakis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
WRound of 32
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Dawid Olejniczak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Dawid Olejniczak · Retired

AmersfoortClay

LQualifying R2
Santiago Ventura
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Edwin Kempes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Magnus Gustafsson vs Edwin Kempes, Amsterdam 2000, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research