Francisco Costa vs Jakub Herm Zahlava, Stuttgart 2000, Qualifying R1

Final

Francisco Costa

WinnerATP: 1528

Costa won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 13–6

Set 27–6⁵

Set 36–3

Jakub Herm Zahlava

LostATP: 1082

Tennis Club WeissenhofStuttgart, GER

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

98.5Average

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

15°CMild

17km/hGentle

85%Very humid

386mModerate

Head to head

2Costa

1Zahlava

3 meetings

StuttgartQualifying R1 · 15 Jul 2000ClayThis match
Francisco Costa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Jakub Herm Zahlava
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 3
Reggio EmiliaRound of 32 · 2003Clay
Jakub Herm Zahlava
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Francisco Costa
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5
WeidenQuarterfinal · 2000Clay
Francisco Costa
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Jakub Herm Zahlava
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Francisco Costa vs Jakub Herm Zahlava, Stuttgart 2000, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research