Martin Verkerk vs Melle Van Gemerden, Scheveningen 2000, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-0 6-2Venue and conditions
Mets Tennisbanen (De Mets), ScheveningenScheveningen, NED
ClayCourt speed94.2Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
2Verkerk
0Gemerden
2 meetings- ScheveningenQuarterfinal · 2000ClayThis matchMartin VerkerkSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Melle Van GemerdenSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
- AmersfoortRound of 32 · 13 Jul 2004ClayMartin VerkerkSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Melle Van GemerdenSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Form and path
Martin Verkerk2–4
Tarragona CHClay
Bucharest CHClay
Scheveningen CHClay
KasselClay
- WFinalMartin VerkerkSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Felipe ParadaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 611
Melle Van Gemerden1–5
San Marino CHClay
Rimini CHClay
Scheveningen CHClay
BredaClay
- LRound of 32Michel MeijerSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Melle Van GemerdenSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
Melle Van Gemerden · Retired
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.