Michael Jessup vs Andrew Nisker, Granby Challenger 2000, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 9 Jul

Final

Michael Jessup

WinnerRank #979

Jessup won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Andrew Nisker

LostRank #1442

Venue

Tennis St-Luc - Les Loisirs de Granby

Granby, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

80%

Humid

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

103 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Jessup

0Nisker

1 meeting

Granby ChallengerQualifying R2 · 9 Jul 2000HardThis match
Michael Jessup
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Andrew Nisker
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Form and path

Michael Jessup

No recent matches recorded.

Andrew Nisker

Granby CHThis week

WQualifying R1
Andrew Nisker
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹³
Matt Klinger
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6¹¹

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michael Jessup vs Andrew Nisker, Granby Challenger 2000, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research