Jan Hernych vs Dominik Meffert, Ulm 2000, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
7-6(0) 6-1Venue and conditions
SSV Ulm 1846, UlmUlm, GER
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Head to head
4Hernych
1Meffert
5 meetingsClay 2–0Hard 2–1
- UlmQualifying R1 · 1 Jul 2000ClayThis matchJan HernychSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Dominik MeffertSets won: 0Set 1: 60Set 2: 1
- ShanghaiQuarterfinal · 9 Sept 2011HardJan HernychSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Dominik MeffertSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- US OpenQualifying R1 · 23 Aug 2011HardDominik MeffertSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan HernychSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- PragueQuarterfinal · 2 May 2008ClayJan HernychSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Dominik MeffertSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- ViennaQualifying R1 · 2008HardJan HernychSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Dominik MeffertSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.