Jonathan Stark vs Peter Wessels, Surbiton Challenger 2000, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Grass

Final · Retired

Jonathan Stark

WinnerRank #829

Stark won · Retired

1–1

Set 16–2

Set 24–6

Set 31–1

Peter Wessels

LostRank #987

Venue

Surbiton Racket & Fitness Club

Surbiton, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

33 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Stark

0Wessels

1 meeting

Surbiton ChallengerRound of 16 · 2000GrassThis match
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 1
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Peter Wessels · Retired

Form and path

Jonathan Stark2–4

St. PetersburgHard

LQualifying R1
Irakli Labadze
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 1

NottinghamGrass

LRound of 32
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
WQualifying R3
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Martin Lee
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 1
WQualifying R2
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Helge Koll
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Waikoloa CHHard

LRound of 32
Johan Ortegren
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3

ShanghaiHard

LQualifying R3
Mikhail Youzhny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁹Set 2: 6
Jonathan Stark
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁷Set 2: 3

Peter Wessels3–3

AschaffenburgClay

LRound of 32
Franjo Raspudic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5
Peter Wessels · Retired

Scheveningen CHClay

LQualifying R2
Augustin Gensse
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

RotterdamClay

LSemifinal
Farrukh Dustov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
WQuarterfinal
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7⁷
Antal Van Der Duim
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁵
WRound of 16
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Nick Van Der Meer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Nick Van Der Meer · Retired
WRound of 32
Peter Wessels
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Thomas Schoorel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jonathan Stark vs Peter Wessels, Surbiton Challenger 2000, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research