Jan Vacek vs Frantisek Cermak, Budapest Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Jan Vacek

WinnerRank #1155

Vacek won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Frantisek Cermak

LostRank #1131

Venue

Romai TeniszakademiaBudapest

Budapest, HUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

101 m

Low

Head to head

1Vacek

0Cermak

1 meeting

Budapest ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2000ClayThis match
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Form and path

Jan Vacek3–3

Manchester CHGrass

LRound of 32
Sam Groth
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 7⁷
Jan Vacek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6⁵

WimbledonGrass

HalleGrass

Frantisek Cermak1–5

KitzbuhelClay

LQualifying R1
Anton Zaitcev
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

PragueClay

LQualifying R2
David Novotny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
WQualifying R1
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Zednik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

ChennaiHard

LQualifying R1
Illya Marchenko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Prostejov CHClay

LQualifying R1
Ivo Minar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Rome CHClay

LQualifying R2
Salvatore Caruso
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frantisek Cermak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Vacek vs Frantisek Cermak, Budapest Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research