Salvador Navarro vs Mike Bryan, Armonk Challenger 2000, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Salvador Navarro

WinnerRank #1067

Navarro won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 26–7³

Set 36–2

Mike Bryan

LostRank #684

Venue

Armonk Tennis Club

Armonk, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

175 m

Low

Head to head

1Navarro

0Bryan

1 meeting

Armonk ChallengerSemifinal · 2000ClayThis match
Salvador Navarro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 6
Mike Bryan
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 2

Form and path

Salvador Navarro1–5

BucharestClay

LQualifying R1
Teodor Dacian Craciun
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Navarro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 3

Australian OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Juan Pablo Brzezicki
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Navarro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Seville CHClay

Brasov CHClay

LRound of 32
Juan Pablo Guzman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Navarro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Freudenstadt CHClay

LRound of 32
Jan Frode Andersen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Salvador Navarro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Mike Bryan3–3

DusseldorfClay

LRound robin
Thomas Johansson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mike Bryan
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

WashingtonHard

San JoseHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Salvador Navarro vs Mike Bryan, Armonk Challenger 2000, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research