Andrei Pavel vs Arnaud Clement, Rome Masters 2000, Qualifying R2

Masters 1000 · Qualifying R2 · Clay · Sun 7 May

Final

Andrei Pavel

WinnerRank #890

Pavel won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–1

Arnaud Clement

LostRank #576

Venue

Foro Italico

Rome, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

20 m

Sea level

Head to head

2Pavel

1Clement

3 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–1

Rome MastersQualifying R2 · 7 May 2000ClayThis match
Andrei Pavel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arnaud Clement
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
RotterdamRound of 16 · 2001Hard
Andrei Pavel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arnaud Clement
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
US OpenRound of 16 · 2000Hard
Arnaud Clement
Sets won: 3Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Set 4: 7⁷
Andrei Pavel
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 1Set 4: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andrei Pavel vs Arnaud Clement, Rome Masters 2000, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research