Pete Sampras vs Greg Rusedski, Miami Masters 2000, Round of 16

Masters 1000 · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Pete Sampras

WinnerRank #34

Sampras won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Greg Rusedski

LostRank #944

Venue

Tennis Center at Crandon Park

Key Biscayne, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 4m

6Aces2

2Double faults3

38Service points won33

9Service games played9

9Service games won6

9Return games played9

1/1100%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

3Sampras

0Rusedski

3 meetings

Miami MastersRound of 16 · 2000HardThis match
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Greg Rusedski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
US OpenRound of 32 · 2002Hard
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷Set 4: 3Set 5: 6
Greg Rusedski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 6³Set 4: 6Set 5: 4
ScottsdaleRound of 32 · 2000Hard
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Greg Rusedski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Form and path

Pete Sampras6–0

US OpenHard

WFinal
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 5Set 4: 6
Andre Agassi
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Set 4: 4
WSemifinal
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Sjeng Schalken
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 2
WQuarterfinal
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Andy Roddick
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
WRound of 16
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁵Set 4: 7
Tommy Haas
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷Set 4: 5
WRound of 32
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷Set 4: 3Set 5: 6
Greg Rusedski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 6³Set 4: 6Set 5: 4
WRound of 64
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Kristian Pless
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5Set 3: 4

Greg Rusedski2–4

Sarajevo CHHard

LRound of 32
Kenneth Carlsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Greg Rusedski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Dnepropetrovsk CHHard

US OpenHard

LRound of 128
Tim Henman
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Greg Rusedski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 2Set 3: 3

New HavenHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pete Sampras vs Greg Rusedski, Miami Masters 2000, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research