Satoshi Iwabuchi vs Arvind Parmar, Kyoto Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Carpet

Final

Satoshi Iwabuchi

LostRank #1339

Parmar won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 17–5

Set 26–7⁵

Set 31–6

Arvind Parmar

WinnerRank #1507

Venue

Kataoka Arena Kyoto

Kyoto, JPN· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

30 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Iwabuchi

2Parmar

2 meetings

Carpet 0–1Grass 0–1

Kyoto ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2000CarpetThis match
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Satoshi Iwabuchi
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 1
Manchester ChallengerRound of 32 · 2000Grass
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Satoshi Iwabuchi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Form and path

Satoshi Iwabuchi2–4

Seoul CHHard

NonthaburiHard

LRound of 32
Jae Sung An
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Satoshi Iwabuchi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

NonthaburiHard

LRound of 32
Peerakiat Siriluethaiwattana
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Satoshi Iwabuchi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

GyeongsanHard

LRound of 32
Jae Won Choi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Satoshi Iwabuchi
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Arvind Parmar2–4

Orleans CHHard

LQualifying R2
Jean-Kome Loglo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Robert Kendrick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Bronx CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Satoshi Iwabuchi vs Arvind Parmar, Kyoto Challenger 2000, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research