Kevin Ullyett vs Arvind Parmar, Kyoto Challenger 2000, Final

Challenger · Final · Carpet

Final

Kevin Ullyett

WinnerRank #1412

Ullyett won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–7³

Set 26–4

Set 36–4

Arvind Parmar

LostRank #1507

Venue

Kataoka Arena Kyoto

Kyoto, JPN· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

30 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

1Ullyett

0Parmar

1 meeting

Kyoto ChallengerFinal · 2000CarpetThis match
Kevin Ullyett
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Form and path

Kevin Ullyett1–5

JohannesburgHard

LQualifying R1
Roman Valent
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Ullyett
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Queen's ClubGrass

LQualifying R1
Wesley Whitehouse
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kevin Ullyett
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

MoscowCarpet

WashingtonHard

LQualifying R1
Richard Fromberg
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Kevin Ullyett
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 3

Los AngelesHard

LQualifying R2
Cristiano Caratti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 7
Kevin Ullyett
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6²Set 3: 5

Arvind Parmar2–4

Orleans CHHard

LQualifying R2
Jean-Kome Loglo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Robert Kendrick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Bronx CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kevin Ullyett vs Arvind Parmar, Kyoto Challenger 2000, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research