Tomas Zib vs Justin Gimelstob, San Jose 2000, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 7-6(4)Venue and conditions
SAP Center at San Jose (San Jose Arena / HP Pavilion at San Jose)San Jose, USA
Indoor hardCourt speed99.9Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude37 mSea level
Match stats
1h 36m1Aces8
2Double faults4
45Service points won49
11Service games played11
9Service games won10
11Return games played11
1/333%Break points saved50%1/2
1/250%Break points converted67%2/3
Head to head
1Zib
1Gimelstob
2 meetings- San JoseRound of 16 · 2000HardThis matchJustin GimelstobSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Tomas ZibSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 64
- ChennaiQuarterfinal · 7 Jan 2005HardTomas ZibSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Justin GimelstobSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 64
Form and path
Tomas Zib3–3
GstaadClay
Furth CHClay
Justin Gimelstob1–5
St. PetersburgCarpet
TokyoHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.